Security doors have become a common necessity for households, offering essential protection in today's homes. As living standards improve, the design of anti-theft security doors continues to evolve—ranging from simple and modern to elegant and sophisticated. However, despite these changes, what truly matters to consumers is not just the appearance but the door’s actual security performance.
In recent years, numerous reports about unsafe security doors have appeared in various media outlets, significantly eroding public trust in these products. This has led many to question: What exactly is a security door? Why do so many of them fail to provide real protection?
For many manufacturers, November 24, 2006, was a turning point. On that day, CCTV’s "Weekly Quality Report" aired a special episode titled “Pure Wood Creates ‘Fragile’ Security Doors.†The program quickly sparked widespread public concern, drawing attention from consumers, industry professionals, and government officials alike.
Consumers, who are naturally vigilant when it comes to their safety, reacted strongly. With authoritative sources like CCTV pointing out flaws in the market, many people began questioning the quality of their own doors. Some even took the drastic step of dismantling their doors to check for signs of poor construction. It seemed as though, overnight, security doors had lost all credibility, and trust in them had hit rock bottom.
As the saying goes, “A frozen river doesn’t form in a single cold day.†The current crisis surrounding security doors didn’t happen overnight. Long before the CCTV report, there were numerous news stories across the country highlighting issues with door quality. A quick search online reveals thousands of articles exposing problems with security doors.
The structure of an anti-theft door isn't complicated—essentially, it's two steel plates with a lock in between. But the real issue lies in the materials used. Consumers can easily spot the problem by looking at the thickness of the steel plate or checking the filler inside the door. Most so-called security doors on the market have a facade steel plate that is only 0.8mm thick, with some as thin as 0.2-0.3mm. Even with heavy paint, they rarely exceed 0.5mm, making them nearly useless for security purposes.
Some unscrupulous businesses take advantage of this by mislabeling thinner doors as higher quality. They may claim to sell 1.0mm doors when they're actually 0.6mm or 0.8mm. This deception leaves consumers confused and vulnerable.
According to the national standard GB17565-1998, the security door must be able to withstand damage for at least 15 minutes when a 615 cm² hole is made. To meet this requirement, the steel plate should be at least 1mm thick. Yet, most doors currently on the market fall short of this standard, raising serious doubts about their true effectiveness.
In conclusion, while security doors are meant to protect, many fail to deliver on their promise. The lack of strict regulations and the prevalence of substandard products have left consumers questioning the reliability of these essential home features. It's time for stricter oversight, better transparency, and more accountability in the industry to restore public confidence.
Butterfly Valve,Sanitary Butterfly Valve,Tri Clamp Butterfly Valve,Plastic Duckbill Butterfly Valve
Ningbo Wenhan Fluid Equipments Co., Ltd. , https://www.wenhanvalves.com