In today's world, a sturdy security door has become a basic necessity for many households. As living standards improve, the design of anti-theft doors continues to evolve, ranging from simple and modern to elegant and stylish. However, despite these changes, the most important factor people consider when choosing a security door is not its appearance, but its actual security performance.
Unfortunately, in recent years, numerous reports have emerged about unsafe security doors being sold in the market. These stories have significantly eroded consumer confidence, bringing trust in anti-theft doors to an all-time low. This raises an important question: what exactly is a security door? And why are so many of them failing to provide the protection they promise?
For many manufacturers, November 24, 2006, was a turning point. On that day, CCTV’s "Weekly Quality Report" aired a special program titled “Pure Wood Creates ‘Fragile Security Doors’.†The program quickly sparked widespread public concern, with reactions coming from consumers, manufacturers, and government officials alike. The exposure of substandard products led to increased suspicion among buyers, with some even going as far as dismantling their own doors to check for quality issues.
The problem didn’t arise overnight. Long before the CCTV report, various media outlets had already raised concerns about the quality of security doors. A quick search online reveals thousands of articles discussing the shortcomings of these products. It’s clear that the issue runs deeper than just one news segment.
In reality, the structure of a security door isn't overly complex. It typically consists of two steel plates with a lock in between. But the real issue lies in the materials used. Many so-called anti-theft doors on the market have steel panels that are only 0.8mm thick, or even less—some as thin as 0.2-0.3mm. Even with thick paint, these doors rarely exceed 0.5mm in effective thickness, which offers little to no real protection against break-ins.
Some unscrupulous companies even mislead customers by using misleading labels, such as marking a 0.6mm door as 0.8mm or 1.0mm. This deception has led to growing distrust among consumers.
According to the current national standard (GB17565-1998), there are no strict regulations on the thickness of the door panel itself, only that the steel frame should be at least 2mm thick. However, the standard does specify that a security door must withstand attempts to create a 615 square centimeter hole for at least 15 minutes. To meet this requirement, the steel plate thickness should be at least 1mm. Based on this, most of the so-called anti-theft doors currently on the market raise serious doubts about their true effectiveness.
This highlights a critical gap between what is advertised and what is actually delivered. Consumers deserve better protection, and it’s time for stricter enforcement of safety standards to ensure that security doors truly live up to their name.
Fitting And Pipes,Tri Clamp Fittings,Tri Clamp Pipe Fitting,Stainless Steel Pipe Clamp,
Ningbo Wenhan Fluid Equipments Co., Ltd. , https://www.wenhanvalves.com